Animal Farm Dir. Robert Icke - Tour / Transfer rumour
Feb 6, 2022 13:47:07 GMT
BurlyBeaR, Jan, and 7 more like this
Post by andrew on Feb 6, 2022 13:47:07 GMT
Yeah that's the first time prior to the West End has appeared although it presumably was on the cards given the names involved.
I have had the fortune now of seeing this on it's last night at the Birmingham Rep, which seemed about 80% full. The apathy of this city towards decent theatre is a subject for another thread, the audience was quite heavily older couples, certainly almost all adults, with a handful of teenagers and the odd primary school child floating around.
As you can tell from the pictures, Christie and Icke have gone for a fairly bleak and industrial set, which whilst not very full of bells and whistles feels like it's constantly moving and provides a lot of pace to the 90 minute play. It's sad to say but I feel like I'm developing a bit of puppet fatigue, I think a few years ago I'd have been raving about the excellent puppetry but there's been quite a lot of it peppering UK theatre for the last decade so it ends up feeling very competent, if not awe-inspiring. They're well designed, at times cute and at times scary. Importantly they hold your attention throughout a play which has only a few minutes of human acting on stage, and they on the whole passed the test of allowing you to forget the presence of the puppeteers. One thing Icke talked about in the programme (free and digital) was that he was excited to use different scales as a feature of having a puppet-based cast, and he does it a few times in a way very reminiscent of Groundhog Day, if anyone remembers the car chase sequence. I found this quite effective, but my partner found that the tiny puppets combined with the large humans controlling them destroyed the magic a bit. Design wise I actually felt the least amount of Bunny Christie I've felt in recent years, where are the neon lights and light boxes? One design feature I loved was a large surtitle-esque text display above the stage, which along with helping us see how much time has passed between scenes would stop the action on stage to dourly memorialise the death of any of the characters in a very modern-Communist way. And whilst Icke has not used one of his classic revolves, he does make the cast revolve themselves at a couple of points, he simply cannot resist.
It's a fairly straightforward adaptation of the novel, there are changes that have been made for the stage, but as far as I could remember the plot is carried out much as it is in the book. Music is used to great effect, both original scoring, the animals singing and some choice pieces of Classical British orchestral stuff. It's mildly funny, probably at the right tone for the subject matter. Is it a children's play though? I would say absolutely not. Icke talks about how he tries to make everything he does accessible for younger audiences, but it seems he's referring to middle-teenagers. Sitting behind me (and talking quite a lot, it's hard to blame him) was a boy of around 6 or 7, he had no idea what the point of all this was and I think the enormous death toll of the main characters and bleak outlook of the play was tonally completely age inappropriate. It's absolutely fine for the type of age group that would have been reading Animal Farm anyway (in fact reckon I would have loved to see this at that secondary school age) but I get the feeling the recommended 11+ bracket I saw advertised was not stressed enough, do not take your children to this.
One thing I'm still wrapping my head around is that the entire animal cast is pre-recorded. This isn't advertised as far as I could tell, it wasn't until I heard Kevin Harvey's unmistakable voice that I started to wonder if the voice cast were actually there. You can see the puppeteers not mouthing anything, but I had assumed perhaps they were taking turns off stage to speak into microphones like it was a design choice to not see the humans voicing their dialogue. Later on I found the likes of Juliet Stephenson listed in the voice cast list (no idea which animal she was to be honest) and Robert Glenister. Whilst I'm pleased to have such talent behind these characters, you could tell at a couple of points that the puppeteers weren't quite sure when their line of dialogue was starting and struggling to time their movements. The puppeteers did make the animal noises (breathing, grunting, squealing, barking etc), but I have to ask why they couldn't have just voiced the characters? I don't know how I feel about recordings of London actors being paraded around the regions like this. It doesn't seem necessary and I'm not sure I like the vibe of it, although I struggle to articulate exactly why it gets my hackles up.
All the pieces of this are good and it works very well for what it is. I think I was a bit misled by Robert Icke's ownership of it, and expected something along the lines of his other adaptations which tend to blow open the usual interpretations and do really interesting things you wouldn't expect with classic pieces of literature and theatre. This does not occur with Animal Farm. It feels more like a pet project where the creators fancied to do something a bit fun and play around with puppets. What they've created is a very effective, and eminently tourable production of a classic that is entertaining and thrilling and captures the spirit of the novel as best I can remember it. It's a high quality bit of theatre, but I missed the frisson of seeing something new and daring that I thought I might have got. If I had arrived thinking this was a locally driven production, I would have been very impressed, so it's me that's at fault for expecting too much. Overall it scores 4 stars from me, and I look forward to hearing others thoughts as it makes it's way towards "London's Glitzy West End"...
I have had the fortune now of seeing this on it's last night at the Birmingham Rep, which seemed about 80% full. The apathy of this city towards decent theatre is a subject for another thread, the audience was quite heavily older couples, certainly almost all adults, with a handful of teenagers and the odd primary school child floating around.
As you can tell from the pictures, Christie and Icke have gone for a fairly bleak and industrial set, which whilst not very full of bells and whistles feels like it's constantly moving and provides a lot of pace to the 90 minute play. It's sad to say but I feel like I'm developing a bit of puppet fatigue, I think a few years ago I'd have been raving about the excellent puppetry but there's been quite a lot of it peppering UK theatre for the last decade so it ends up feeling very competent, if not awe-inspiring. They're well designed, at times cute and at times scary. Importantly they hold your attention throughout a play which has only a few minutes of human acting on stage, and they on the whole passed the test of allowing you to forget the presence of the puppeteers. One thing Icke talked about in the programme (free and digital) was that he was excited to use different scales as a feature of having a puppet-based cast, and he does it a few times in a way very reminiscent of Groundhog Day, if anyone remembers the car chase sequence. I found this quite effective, but my partner found that the tiny puppets combined with the large humans controlling them destroyed the magic a bit. Design wise I actually felt the least amount of Bunny Christie I've felt in recent years, where are the neon lights and light boxes? One design feature I loved was a large surtitle-esque text display above the stage, which along with helping us see how much time has passed between scenes would stop the action on stage to dourly memorialise the death of any of the characters in a very modern-Communist way. And whilst Icke has not used one of his classic revolves, he does make the cast revolve themselves at a couple of points, he simply cannot resist.
It's a fairly straightforward adaptation of the novel, there are changes that have been made for the stage, but as far as I could remember the plot is carried out much as it is in the book. Music is used to great effect, both original scoring, the animals singing and some choice pieces of Classical British orchestral stuff. It's mildly funny, probably at the right tone for the subject matter. Is it a children's play though? I would say absolutely not. Icke talks about how he tries to make everything he does accessible for younger audiences, but it seems he's referring to middle-teenagers. Sitting behind me (and talking quite a lot, it's hard to blame him) was a boy of around 6 or 7, he had no idea what the point of all this was and I think the enormous death toll of the main characters and bleak outlook of the play was tonally completely age inappropriate. It's absolutely fine for the type of age group that would have been reading Animal Farm anyway (in fact reckon I would have loved to see this at that secondary school age) but I get the feeling the recommended 11+ bracket I saw advertised was not stressed enough, do not take your children to this.
One thing I'm still wrapping my head around is that the entire animal cast is pre-recorded. This isn't advertised as far as I could tell, it wasn't until I heard Kevin Harvey's unmistakable voice that I started to wonder if the voice cast were actually there. You can see the puppeteers not mouthing anything, but I had assumed perhaps they were taking turns off stage to speak into microphones like it was a design choice to not see the humans voicing their dialogue. Later on I found the likes of Juliet Stephenson listed in the voice cast list (no idea which animal she was to be honest) and Robert Glenister. Whilst I'm pleased to have such talent behind these characters, you could tell at a couple of points that the puppeteers weren't quite sure when their line of dialogue was starting and struggling to time their movements. The puppeteers did make the animal noises (breathing, grunting, squealing, barking etc), but I have to ask why they couldn't have just voiced the characters? I don't know how I feel about recordings of London actors being paraded around the regions like this. It doesn't seem necessary and I'm not sure I like the vibe of it, although I struggle to articulate exactly why it gets my hackles up.
All the pieces of this are good and it works very well for what it is. I think I was a bit misled by Robert Icke's ownership of it, and expected something along the lines of his other adaptations which tend to blow open the usual interpretations and do really interesting things you wouldn't expect with classic pieces of literature and theatre. This does not occur with Animal Farm. It feels more like a pet project where the creators fancied to do something a bit fun and play around with puppets. What they've created is a very effective, and eminently tourable production of a classic that is entertaining and thrilling and captures the spirit of the novel as best I can remember it. It's a high quality bit of theatre, but I missed the frisson of seeing something new and daring that I thought I might have got. If I had arrived thinking this was a locally driven production, I would have been very impressed, so it's me that's at fault for expecting too much. Overall it scores 4 stars from me, and I look forward to hearing others thoughts as it makes it's way towards "London's Glitzy West End"...