1,103 posts
|
Post by mallardo on Jun 23, 2019 8:21:54 GMT
After a hiatus the Terence Rattigan revival returns with a production of this farcical comedy that was a big hit for Rattigan back in 1943 - it was one of three plays he had running simultaneously in the West End, the other two being Flare Path and Love in Idleness. As it's Rattigan one can be sure it's a well made play and it is, every little fragment of information planted in the first act bearing fruit in the second and third, but it's pretty lightweight stuff and, over all, strains to justify its two and a half hour length.
The farcical element is, naturally enough, the plot, featuring three military men - Englishman, Frenchman and American: it's wartime, after all - proclaiming their love for the same guileless young woman while the bride-to-be's conniving father and an older, wiser lady of questionable virtue stand by to collect what they can and generally add to the complications. It's often very funny with some brilliant Rattigan-esque set pieces, especially in the latter two acts. But, it must be said, the first act with its exposition and its setup scenes is a bit of a chore.
Still, the usual fine cast - with one exception - from the Orange Tree and an absolute star turn from the always wonderful Dorothea Meyer-Bennett as Mabel, the "other" woman, stealing every scene she's in. You have to wait for her - she doesn't appear until act two, which may be the real problem with act one.
With a qualm or two, recommended.
|
|
899 posts
|
Post by bordeaux on Jun 23, 2019 8:35:11 GMT
|
|
49 posts
|
Post by kjb on Jul 6, 2019 20:52:08 GMT
I saw this this afternoon and agree that it was well written but quite light. It was the first Rattigan farce I've seen and although it was well structured, it wasn't a patch on Present Laughter that I saw earlier on in the week but I am glad I made the effor (This might be the production rather than the writing though) I totally agree that there was a massive weak link in the cast. I wonder if we agree on which cast member it was!.
Dorothea Myer-Bennett was indeed wonderful. What's this about SATTF being defunct?
It was my 4th or 5th visit to this theatre, but I don't think I've been for a Saturday matinee before. I was the youngest person there by at least 30 years. 50 years in some cases I reckon. I hope I am still theatregoing when I am 75-95!
|
|
1,245 posts
|
Post by joem on Jul 6, 2019 22:22:47 GMT
Light comedy, well farce really, which is of its time. Undemanding stuff if you want some laughs without too much thinking. yes it's cleverly-written and very well structured but the claims of hidden depth being made for it in some quarters are I think excessive and driven by wishful thinking.
Enjoyable though.
|
|
1,346 posts
|
Post by tmesis on Jul 19, 2019 10:35:05 GMT
Sometimes when at the Almeida, Donmar or, increasingly at the NT when I have just endured another achingly right-on production of some edgey new, or not so new drama, I yearn for 'The Well Made Play' that is extremely well acted, inventively directed and stylishly designed. Well I got that last night here. Although the play is quite dated it was performed so winningly that you could just surrender to the farcical elements whilst also admiring Rattigan's technical skill in setting up all the plot strands.
I also liked how they preserved the 3 act structure with two intervals - in fact I couldn't see it working as well in any other way.
The top-notch cast was led by the excellent Philip Labey as the Earl. Throughout the performance it bugged me that I recognised his face - where had I seen him before? Some play at The Nash? No, it was the Oak Furniture Land ads of yore where he plays the young sales assistant with the catch-phrase 'No veneer in 'ere!'
|
|
397 posts
|
Post by altamont on Feb 15, 2020 18:24:28 GMT
This is coming back to the Orange Tree for four weeks in the summer
|
|
899 posts
|
Post by bordeaux on Feb 15, 2020 19:26:51 GMT
I saw this this afternoon and agree that it was well written but quite light. It was the first Rattigan farce I've seen and although it was well structured, it wasn't a patch on Present Laughter that I saw earlier on in the week but I am glad I made the effor (This might be the production rather than the writing though) I totally agree that there was a massive weak link in the cast. I wonder if we agree on which cast member it was!. Dorothea Myer-Bennett was indeed wonderful. What's this about SATTF being defunct? It was my 4th or 5th visit to this theatre, but I don't think I've been for a Saturday matinee before. I was the youngest person there by at least 30 years. 50 years in some cases I reckon. I hope I am still theatregoing when I am 75-95! SAttF is not defunct but Andrew Hilton is no longer in charge. They did a middling Much Ado last autumn with only a couple of the familiar faces from their glory days (of only three or four years ago). The new team in charge of the Tobacco Factory theatre apparently wanted to do their own thing in the spring (when the SATTF always did their two plays), so the regular slot has gone and it all sounds a bit ad hoc to me. The website says they will announce their 2020 production soon.
|
|
1,828 posts
|
Post by Dave B on Nov 27, 2021 21:18:01 GMT
This is back and we had a very enjoyable afternoon out in Richmond. Smart and funny and well cast.
|
|
|
Post by Jan on Nov 28, 2021 10:26:58 GMT
I’m seeing this soon. The fact it is lightweight is. a big positive in my book.
On Shakespeare @ Tobacco Factory mentioned above, it really has closed forever now - as they took Covid recovery funds I think this is a poor effort by them and other active theatres should have got that money instead.
|
|
1,346 posts
|
Post by tmesis on Nov 28, 2021 20:17:23 GMT
I saw it again yesterday - it was a slightly different cast and not quite as sharp as before but still very enjoyable.
|
|
|
Post by Jan on Dec 18, 2021 18:13:34 GMT
I thought this was great, just what was needed. Farce is a much under-appreciated genre. Michael Lumsden really excellent.
|
|