|
Post by cavocado on Jun 19, 2023 18:20:11 GMT
Sorry for random question - I’ve had to miss the performance I had a ticket for. Is there any way round the restriction on leaving a single seat? Trying to book a £25 one but for the dates I can do can’t because of the leaving a single seat restriction they have at Delfont? On another thread someone suggested using another device and put the neighbouring seats in your basket, then you may be able to book the single seat you want on the first device. I have tried that elsewhere and it's worked, but can't remember if I've tried it with DMT.
|
|
1,280 posts
|
Post by theatrefan77 on Jun 27, 2023 23:47:47 GMT
I enjoyed this at the Gielgud much more than last year at the National, the production seems a lot tighter now somehow, and Brian Gleeson is a great addition to the cast, really excellent as John Proctor.
The front row offers great value for £25.
|
|
|
Post by solotheatregoer on Jul 20, 2023 22:30:32 GMT
Three stars for me. I found this a little slow and hard to get in to. The saving grace really are the performances, particularly Brian Gleeson, Milly Alcock, Caitlin Fitzgerald and Nia Towle.
|
|
526 posts
|
Post by danielwhit on Jul 22, 2023 21:59:36 GMT
Great revival, surprised it isn't selling especially well.
|
|
366 posts
|
Post by Paul on Aug 8, 2023 22:33:20 GMT
I'm hoping to see this soon. Does anyone know where the £25 rush tickets are normally located or does it vary?
|
|
|
Post by kate8 on Aug 9, 2023 6:48:55 GMT
I'm hoping to see this soon. Does anyone know where the £25 rush tickets are normally located or does it vary? I got a stalls seat from TodayTix rush a couple of weeks ago, think it was row G, fairly central. Not sure if this is still the case, but TT were releasing stalls at 10, circle at 10.30.
|
|
546 posts
Member is Online
|
Post by drmaplewood on Aug 9, 2023 9:55:26 GMT
Went on Monday night, front row. No ponchos for the transfer, it seems - I regretted wearing shorts.
|
|
526 posts
|
Post by danielwhit on Aug 17, 2023 21:51:45 GMT
Took myself to a second viewing this afternoon (previously back row in the stalls, this time Row D) and I'm even more of the mind that this is a spectacular revival.
I didn't see this at National however I'm really interested by the fact both Proctor and Abigail were recast for this transfer, as Gleeson and Alcock are the two shining stars for me.
I assume this was recorded at NT and will likely make it's way to NT at Home at some stage.
Es Devlin's reputation is certainly miles higher than it was at her West End debut (I Can't Sing, for anyone who remembers the 40 minute interval!). Simple but very effective stage, delivers the right degree of claustrophobia.
If you're on the fence, go. It's well worth it, even if you've seen The Crucible enough times over the decades.
|
|
781 posts
|
Post by rumbledoll on Aug 18, 2023 9:04:35 GMT
I really wanted to love it… but you know, there’s something barely describable, something eerie that separates good theatre from great theatre. This is just good, well done, not special. Lyndsay Turner tries do hard though (as she did with Hamlet), bless her. With the best contemporary designer, can’t-go-wrong-classics and truly remarkable acting talents she creates a production that is beautiful, but static, well-crafted yet lacking spontaneity. You watch it and you can’t quite get your head around of what exactly is missing, one or two pieces of the puzzle just wouldn’t fit and you can’t hide that even behind the spectacular water curtain (wetwetwet on the front row but GORGEOUS!) There are gripping moments in this one there’s no point denying it but the bottom line is The Crucible shall grab you by the throat steel hard from the very beginning and never let you go. I will always come back in thoughts to The Old Vic production as a touchstone with their authenticity, wild and raw, towering the stage, making you wanna leap from your seat and fight for justice with all your might. The Crucible is meant to tear you apart in pieces by the end but all this one does is a tap on your shoulder to make sure you’re looking. The most rememberable performances for me in here are Brian Gleeson (he made some interesting choices I’ve never seen in other Proctors, this scene when he asks to spare him the signature was soaring), Nia Towle as Marry Warren (the arch of the character is impeccably executed) and Fisayo Akinade as Reverend John Hale (his passion and persistence spot on). Millie Alcock not so much (even though she certainly looks the part), I felt in a one-note performance, some of the brightest stars just not made for the stage as brilliant as they may be on screen (Tom Hardy springs to mind) and it’s alright.
|
|
105 posts
|
Post by youngoffender on Aug 18, 2023 22:05:07 GMT
I finally caught up with this tonight. At best moderately engaging, and by the last 30 mins an interminable bore. It just never melds into anything riveting or transporting, I could not get beyond watching actors of variable talent dutifully running through the lines of a venerable old play.
I was expecting an experience humming with contemporary resonance, so all the more disappointing.
|
|
|
Post by soph26 on Aug 20, 2023 16:26:52 GMT
I saw this yesterday and think I enjoyed it. It was definitely more humorous than I was expecting. The opening context bit didn't quite feel necessary - I know it probably is, but maybe I just don't know enough about McCarthyism to fully appreciate it. The rain curtain while very pretty and a big spectacle on first entering the theatre seemed a bit out of place for the mid-act scene changes, more just highlighting that they weren't especially fast than actually doing anything. Nevertheless an enjoyable production and I am pleased to have seen it. Probably a 3.5 (but rounded up to a 4 for the poll).
|
|
781 posts
|
Post by rumbledoll on Aug 23, 2023 13:23:20 GMT
I was also wondering how Erin Doherty, as brilliant an actress as she is, was perceived as Abigail as she clearly looks her age which is far from being a teenager. Or is it just me?.. Milly Alcock looked pitch prefect for the part though lacked depth.
|
|
|
Post by sph on Aug 24, 2023 0:30:03 GMT
I finally caught up with this tonight. At best moderately engaging, and by the last 30 mins an interminable bore. It just never melds into anything riveting or transporting, I could not get beyond watching actors of variable talent dutifully running through the lines of a venerable old play. I was expecting an experience humming with contemporary resonance, so all the more disappointing. I think that the play was written as such a studied allegory for McCarthyism in 1950s America that it would be difficult to find something as comparable in the same manner today. Certainly witch hunts exist in various forms in modern society, but none align as much with the way the Salem Witch Trials are depicted here. Perhaps cancel culture? But it wouldn't immediately spring to mind from watching this particular production.
|
|
166 posts
Member is Online
|
Post by matty on Aug 25, 2023 21:42:39 GMT
Well I enjoyed this much more tonight than I did when I saw it at the NT (and I enjoyed it then). The £25 front row seats were a bargain and the rain curtain wasn't an issue at all.
The whole cast was great, but I have to say the make up on John Proctor at the end definitely wasn't done to be viewed up close, it didn't look very believable.
Glad I got to see this again before it closes.
|
|
|
Post by intoanewlife on Aug 25, 2023 22:49:34 GMT
I finally caught up with this tonight. At best moderately engaging, and by the last 30 mins an interminable bore. It just never melds into anything riveting or transporting, I could not get beyond watching actors of variable talent dutifully running through the lines of a venerable old play. I was expecting an experience humming with contemporary resonance, so all the more disappointing. I think that the play was written as such a studied allegory for McCarthyism in 1950s America that it would be difficult to find something as comparable in the same manner today. Certainly witch hunts exist in various forms in modern society, but none align as much with the way the Salem Witch Trials are depicted here. Perhaps cancel culture? But it wouldn't immediately spring to mind from watching this particular production. Or perhaps Donald Trump or Nigel Farage or Boris Johnson lying their asses off and a whole heap of people believing them and having an extremely negative effect on the world?
|
|
|
Post by punxsutawney on Aug 26, 2023 17:37:50 GMT
I think that the play was written as such a studied allegory for McCarthyism in 1950s America that it would be difficult to find something as comparable in the same manner today. Certainly witch hunts exist in various forms in modern society, but none align as much with the way the Salem Witch Trials are depicted here. Perhaps cancel culture? But it wouldn't immediately spring to mind from watching this particular production. Or perhaps Donald Trump or Nigel Farage or Boris Johnson lying their asses off and a whole heap of people believing them and having an extremely negative effect on the world? Or rising anti-LGBTQ rhetoric across the world? Or the rise of anti-migrant and fascist rhetoric? I don't think the production should have to have a contemporary tilt to be valid, but it certainly could be given one if they so desired (without being so boring as to resort to the tired cancel culture tropes).
|
|
1,828 posts
Member is Online
|
Post by Dave B on Sept 3, 2023 16:41:53 GMT
I took myself off to see the closing show last night. Loved it at the NT, loved it more here. I thought Brian Gleeson was just great, I thought he got a little more out of Proctor and it just felt like a more all around performance. Last time I had seen Nathan Amzi on in place of Fisayo Akinade, wow. I thought Amzi did a great job but Akinade was just fabulous, a level of humanity in Hale from much earlier on, to the point of where it felt it was just as much Hale's story as Procter's.
Alcock was fine as Abigail but Nia Towle was excellent as Mary Warren, really felt her being dragged all over the place in the trial and I took a lot more from her performance, feels much more central to the story than Abigal does.
Very glad I went back. Pretty sure it was my first time at a last night, more smiles and hugs at the end from the cast but no speeches or anything else. Despite the really hot weather, I brought my rain coat - front row still gets rain curtain, bottom of my jeans were quite damp when I got home later!
|
|
37 posts
|
Post by welcometodreamland on Mar 30, 2024 21:13:11 GMT
I never got the chance to post a review for this when I saw this in August so forgive me for bringing this thread back up so suddenly. Milly Alcock was the reason I bought a ticket and she gave such a striking and strong performance. All the acting was strong. It's a tough mentally straining watch at times when the story plays with paranoia and uncertainty with so many characters on heightened high alert from beginning to end. Staging was good as well. The ramp was unique. I don't know if that was specific to the theatre at all but very effective, though I struggled to see at the back some of the time. Can't really remember how the audience behaved but instict tells me not good.
|
|