|
Post by Jan on Jun 27, 2018 6:38:11 GMT
I enjoyed this. Miller's last play. It's not as good as his best work but how could it be ? It is a very lightly fictionalised account of problems on the shooting of "The Misfits" with Miller and his then wife Marilyn Monroe and others associated with the production (John Huston, Lee Strasberg etc.). Having read biographies of Miller I knew about the background and that made it interesting - I suspect if you know nothing in advance the piece might not have enough drama to sustain your interest. It is well-acted.
The Finborough air conditioning used to be good from what I remember but it seems to have given up the ghost.
|
|
|
Post by learfan on Jun 27, 2018 17:03:20 GMT
Thanks, im going Saturday. Hope the venue is more welcoming than my last visit!
|
|
|
Post by Jan on Jun 27, 2018 17:19:12 GMT
Thanks, im going Saturday. Hope the venue is more welcoming than my last visit! Doubling it with a matinee of the very rare Ibsen currently on at Barons Court ? Ibsen & Miller, great double act.
|
|
5,690 posts
|
Post by lynette on Jun 27, 2018 17:58:12 GMT
Is this the play that was such a disaster at the Old Vic?
|
|
1,502 posts
|
Post by foxa on Jun 27, 2018 18:06:52 GMT
|
|
5,690 posts
|
Post by lynette on Jun 27, 2018 18:23:59 GMT
Can’t access that page, Foxa, but you can take it from me, it was deplorable. Yes, Resurrection. May it never be.
|
|
|
Post by learfan on Jun 27, 2018 20:48:48 GMT
It was def FTP. The great man died not long after the premiere in Chicago.
|
|
|
Post by learfan on Jun 27, 2018 20:49:35 GMT
Can’t access that page, Foxa, but you can take it from me, it was deplorable. Yes, Resurrection. May it never be. It did get slaughtered but surely its worth another go?
|
|
|
Post by learfan on Jun 27, 2018 20:51:07 GMT
Thanks, im going Saturday. Hope the venue is more welcoming than my last visit! Doubling it with a matinee of the very rare Ibsen currently on at Barons Court ? Ibsen & Miller, great double act. Sadly not, i have to ration my trips to London and cant stop over all the time either. Never mind.
|
|
237 posts
|
Post by harrietcraig on Jun 27, 2018 21:38:46 GMT
A Resurrection Blues anecdote: I saw the play after having taken a bad fall (bad enough to send me to A&E) on the street earlier that day. I thought about skipping the play and spending the evening in my hotel room, eating a room service dinner, watching TV, and feeling sorry for myself, but decided I would be better off letting Doctor Theatre work his healing powers. Well, with any other play that might have worked, but this play was in serious need of a doctor itself.
Time has mercifully erased almost all memory of the evening, but I do remember James Fox stumbling over a word (I think it may have been "pharmaceutical"), having to try saying it three of four times before he got it right, and rolling his eyes in exasperation when he finally succeeded -- a lapse in professionalism that I attributed not just to his difficulty with the word that night, but to his frustration at being part of the whole misbegotten production.
|
|
1,245 posts
|
Post by joem on Jun 27, 2018 22:43:03 GMT
I'm going on Sunday. Maybe the air conditioning went the night the storm did for their electrics which meant I missed the Paul Claudel play.
|
|
923 posts
|
Post by Snciole on Jun 28, 2018 11:21:49 GMT
I liked this, the review on View from the Cheap Seat was more critical than me though I agree with it. It is a good production of a difficult play. The marketing reflects this; Miller wants this to be about Monroe and the audience wants this to be about Monroe but Miller is incapable of writing about her because despite the marriage, the association with her I am not sure he knew that well. The marketing isn't quite Consent levels of inappropriateness but once you see the play it would probably be better to market it with pictures of the Strasbergs or John Huston. He, at least, has the decency to make Kitty an unseen, two-dimensional character (her only appearance being her walking naked across the stage which this production has cut) but as a result you end up with a play about making art, about the interference of those who don't understand it and those that understand it all too well, in particular, Paul Bailey's cinematographer's accurate comment is that all the audience want is to see her ass. There are some great performances from Rachel Handshaw as the loyal but increasingly frustrated Edna and Jeremy Daws as Paul but this is a relic of a writer past his best; gone are the subtleties (The Crucible) or a deep understanding of why people do what they do (Incident at Vichy, View from a Bridge). Miller just desperately wants the world to understand his marriage, this shadow of a woman that will always dominate his memory but he is just lacking the heart and soul to get to grips with made Marilyn Kitty who she is and what she was destined to become.
|
|
|
Post by Jan on Jun 28, 2018 15:17:41 GMT
This review confirms the point I made above. It says the part of the Director is vaguely drawn (true) and says they don’t know if it is based on the actual director of The Misfits. Because I know about the background I recognised it as clearly being that director - John Huston (the drugs and gambling and so on all accurate) - and I was able to fill in the gaps in the play’s portrayal of him with that knowledge.
|
|
1,502 posts
|
Post by foxa on Jun 30, 2018 14:42:32 GMT
A side note to the above discussion about Resurrection Blues - there was a quote from one of the producers involved, who felt Spacey treated the director, cast and others involved with the production badly, He called Kevin Spacey 'The Norman Bates of show business.' The book was published in 2010!
The comments above about Finishing the Picture make the play sound interesting and frustrating at once.
|
|
|
Post by learfan on Jun 30, 2018 17:06:02 GMT
Travelling back after today's mat. Hmmm quite good, i felt you needed to know the background. At the interval i heard a chap wondering aloud when we were going to see Clark Gable! Kudos to the Finborough for putting it on but why didnt the Almeida take it on? 3 stars
|
|
1,245 posts
|
Post by joem on Jul 1, 2018 17:55:26 GMT
At World Cup time this is, appropriately, a play of two halves.
The first half is engrossing, although some background does indeed help. "The Misfits" is a great film made more poignant by its being Marilyn Monroe and Clark Gable's last film and one of Montgomery Clift's final appearances too. The concern at how Marilyn's deteriorating health and drug dependency is destroying the film and also finishing her marriage with cold-fish playwright Arthur Miller is an interesting tale which is well told here though one is always conscious that this tale is being told by Miller.
But the second part should have been called "The Absence of Marilyn" and simply fails as a piece ofdrama. A little bit of talking to an actor who isn't there and isn't audibly replying is fine but out of the forty-five minutes or so the whole cast troop to the bedroom of the unseen Kitty to talk to her. Too much. Far too much.
It is almost as if Miller wanted to confess his view of Marilyn's breakdown but still felt the need to disguise this by putting false names on the characters even though everyone knows who everyone was. For such an intelligent man to take this ostrich-like approach to writing about events in his life is, frankly, inexplicable.
|
|