|
Post by cat6 on Apr 9, 2018 14:28:04 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 9, 2018 21:42:08 GMT
I can't bloody wait. Personally, I will try in vein to get a ticket.
|
|
3,563 posts
Member is Online
|
Post by showgirl on Apr 10, 2018 3:35:50 GMT
Though I book ahead for most Downstairs productions, I held off for this one as I don't like science fiction. So if reports are compelling and there are tickets left, I may relent, and would love to hear any views from those who do go.
|
|
|
Post by asfound on May 10, 2018 11:43:19 GMT
As a genetics researcher I thought I'd give this a go - despite some shaky science, a few cringy moments and a script rather derivative of Gattaca it was pretty damn good I thought. But as usual with this kind of thing the human story was far more compelling than the exploration of ethics/politics of genetic testing (which has been done better elsewhere). For a debut play though it was great effort.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on May 10, 2018 12:11:33 GMT
I thought this was a very good episode of Black Mirror, and an excellent opportunity to see the marvellous Jade Anouka at close quarters.
|
|
3,563 posts
Member is Online
|
Post by showgirl on May 10, 2018 13:16:32 GMT
Seeing this Saturday as an early blog review raved about it.
|
|
1,861 posts
|
Post by NeilVHughes on May 12, 2018 17:00:26 GMT
Another good play Downstairs which consistently outperforms it’s Upstairs sibling.
Science may be doubtful and the twist is signalled but the extrapolation from where we are now is not a great stretch as we constantly strive for perfection and obviously an opportunity to catch Jade at close quarters is always appreciated.
The impending closure decision needs to be rescinded, there is no better value, £14 is ridiculously cheap for the quality of Productions which are always well supported, often pay more in fringe Theatres with lower production values and facilities.
|
|
3,563 posts
Member is Online
|
Post by showgirl on May 12, 2018 18:14:03 GMT
Saw today's matinee & thought this was superb, thought-provoking & stunningly good for a first play. It deserves a longer life (transfer?) & is the equal of the best work I've seen in the main house & superior to much of that.
|
|
1,819 posts
|
Post by stevej678 on Jan 10, 2019 10:45:12 GMT
Transferring to the main stage at the Hampstead Theatre, running 19th March - 20th April.
|
|
38 posts
|
Post by quine on Jan 10, 2019 11:09:09 GMT
Transferring to the main stage at the Hampstead Theatre, running 19th March - 20th April. Great news. Hoping for the same cast.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 10, 2019 11:13:05 GMT
|
|
3,563 posts
Member is Online
|
Post by showgirl on Jan 10, 2019 16:15:23 GMT
Good news as this was one of the best plays I saw last year and would have made my top 10 were I minded to compile one.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 14, 2019 9:12:24 GMT
Special valentines day offer -
|
|
|
Post by catcat100 on Mar 22, 2019 23:58:34 GMT
Ooh I do think like a play that I can have a good think about afterwards and I do like a bit of dystopia. Quite lucky then that I went to Hampstead theatre tonight and got a bit of both,
It's a really good concept for a play. Ok a bit Gattacca-ie but that was a long time ago.
Don't know how this played downstairs because they made quite a lot of the stage, lots of big videos and an expanding set which I can't quite see fitting in the small space.
Its whole focus is about 'what is best is right' and how that will eventually pan out. The changes to the set through the play is quite a good metaphor.
Although I do feel it probably focuses a little too much on the have's rather than the have not's.
Overall a really good play and an enjoyable couple of hours. 4 stars.
|
|
92 posts
|
Post by chameleon on Mar 23, 2019 23:02:59 GMT
Not so taken with this. Interesting idea (if a little like GATTACA) but the writing and characterisation is very thin, & the plotting is desultory. It may have worked better downstairs - on this stage it feels a bit exposed...
|
|
1,083 posts
|
Post by andrew on Mar 24, 2019 9:12:20 GMT
I notice I didn't write anything at the time, but I saw this downstairs and thought it was OK but not great, a feeling shared by the friends I was with. Good performances, some interesting ideas, but overall not that compelling. I'm a bit shocked it's transferred to the larger stage and I'm not surprised it's "exposed" up there, as chameleon puts it.
|
|
587 posts
|
Post by Polly1 on Mar 28, 2019 16:21:12 GMT
I thought this was really interesting. The first half is a bit clunky, not surprising from a first time author, but the payoff in act 2 really works, some audible gasps (me included). Jade Anouka is excellent, as expected. Rory Fleck Byrne has poor diction/projection but exactly the type of endearing-ness (is that a word?) needed. Cherrelle Skeete was a bit 'drama graduate' in the first half but much better and affecting in the second. I reckon this could be shortened by 15-20 mins and run without an interval. The premise is fascinating and because the word "ratist" is so close to racist, it really hit home. Other points such as apparent shortage of fruit and water not fully explored. Between scenes videos really clever.
One thing, I wasn't sure what the point was of making the girls change between scenes right at the front and lit from beneath?
|
|
|
Post by orchidman on Mar 28, 2019 23:46:33 GMT
I can understand why people seeing this Downstairs might have been taken with it but once you hit the big stage and get evaluated on that level, it doesn't cut it.
Perhaps the biggest flaw was that the stuff happening in the recorded video was for the most part a lot more interesting than what was happening on stage. So many more interesting ways you could have approached a premise like this. Picked up a bit after the big twist but not enough. Really, way too much progresses off stage politically/socially relative to the length of the time that passes in the main story.
The science being portrayed is entirely unclear which matters. When we see the test numbers at the start, they are percentages. Which means there is still huge uncertainty as to a person's medical fate. But when schizophrenia is being discussed later on it's as though the science is not only accurate enough to predict 100% but even down to when the disease will hit. The social implications of knowing someone's tendencies towards disease are small, it is only knowing their exact medical future that is a potential powder-keg. And if we reached that stage of technology, the idea we would need post-birth abortion is laughable.
The idea that there would be one number out of ten makes no sense. It is portrayed that lots of tricks and fraud is going on, but someone would just invent a different metric which weights things differently and people who score higher on that metric would start quoting that instead. The idea that one specific metric would completely dominate society is ridiculous.
The stuff about fruit was just thrown in for no reason. Some of the dialogue is painfully bad, especially at the awkward interval break. Some totally off bits like the girl having her test done for Huntington's by one of her best friends who knows her father has the disease but is totally blasé about the whole thing as it's getting calculated despite the fact her friend has a 50/50 chance of being given a death sentence.
I could nitpick a lot more things. Stuff which you let go when the material works because in sci-fi there will always be some rough edges but this story wasn't involving enough. The premise is very good but it's not in the least bit original and the execution is pretty poor. Didn't believe the world at all.
|
|
87 posts
|
Post by greenswan on Mar 31, 2019 6:51:26 GMT
I thought this was alright. Too long for sure and the twist was pretty sign posted if you’ve watched something like Black Mirror before. Still, the videos were great and the two female roles especially well acted I thought.
I didn’t struggle as much with the suspension of disbelief- I suppose I see it more as a thought experiment taken to extremes.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 2, 2019 11:55:08 GMT
Quite enjoyed this. Agree with the comment above that it could have been tightened up and done straight through (maybe drop the fruit subplot, or some of the videos). Worked well though and the escalating situation got gasps from some of the audience.
|
|
1,346 posts
|
Post by tmesis on Apr 6, 2019 17:43:45 GMT
I was at the matinee today. I go to most things at Hampstead and since this was well received Downstairs (I didn't see it then) I thought I'd give it a punt. Had I read the dreaded word 'dystopian' I wouldn't have bothered, since nothing puts me off a novel/play/film more than that. However, I'm glad I did because I really enjoyed it: strong ideas, strong cast and a striking set design.
|
|