2,047 posts
|
Post by Marwood on Aug 22, 2016 11:19:31 GMT
Just booked a £10 preview ticket - anyone else going?
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 22, 2016 12:13:35 GMT
Thanks for the reminder, Marwood - just nabbed a £10 seat for the Thursday. Still a few up for grabs, especially in the dress circle...
|
|
2,047 posts
|
Post by Marwood on Aug 22, 2016 12:40:00 GMT
To be honest I'd forgotten all about this until just after 12, but still managed to get a row L stalls seat (everything in front was a good £30-40 more expensive) - 7 seems a strange time to start for something that runs 60 minutes without an interval: as there's nothing else on in the Vic that night, I would have thought they would have gone for a start at 8 or 9, unless they're hoping everyone is going to pile into their bars after to make an evening of it.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 22, 2016 13:07:12 GMT
Yes, that start time is weird. But handy for me as the theatre is only a 5 minute walk away from the office, and it will be good to get back home at a decent time without having to risk the drunks and muggers!
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 9, 2016 0:07:00 GMT
Just booked a £10 preview ticket - anyone else going? Not I
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 29, 2016 21:40:45 GMT
Even an hour of Samuel Beckett proved too much for some people at the Old Vic tonight. Because there was no interval, one bored couple decided to take advantage of the theatre being plunged into darkness for a scene change to scarper off home. Unfortunately, because the whole place was pitch black, the rest of their row didn't realise until quite late that they wanted out. By the time they'd noticed, the scene change was over, the lights went up like a searchlight outside a prison, framing the luckless duo stumbling out, just as Lisa Dwan dramatically shrieked her next line, coincidentally exactly in their direction: "Leeeeave!" Like rabbits in headlights...
|
|
171 posts
|
Post by moelhywel on Sept 29, 2016 23:01:56 GMT
|
|
433 posts
|
Post by DuchessConstance on Sept 29, 2016 23:16:02 GMT
They've been offering £5 stalls seats for next week - can't be selling well.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 30, 2016 7:51:21 GMT
Yeah, I looked ahead on the booking plan and it's not.
I can understand why - Beckett's a nightmare to make any sense of; I sat there for 60 mins last night thinking, "Well, it could mean this... or it could mean that... or, actually, the whole thing could just be a waste of an hour..."
But Dwan is an amazing performer, so that kept me in my seat while others (only a few, and only in the dress circle as far as I could tell) gave in and legged it. (When people do that, they really need to bear in mind that they can be heard as they make their way along the small corridor that leads out.)
Anyway... Dwan uses her voice and movement in intriguing ways - even if, at times, it seems she doesn't have room for movement at all. And the whole thing is interestingly lit. You realise at one point that, even if close up the paint is peeling, the Old Vic proscenium arch (is that what they call the intricately patterned thing that basically frames the stage?) is truly beautiful. There's probably a metaphor in that somewhere...
|
|
117 posts
|
Post by ldm2016 on Sept 30, 2016 8:29:50 GMT
I saw this last night too...
Amazing performance by Dwan (as always) and strangely beautiful in places. However, too arcane and the Old Vic is the wrong theatre for this production. Very well attended last night - even had to queue up to get inside the Old Vic - but will struggle to sell seats over the course of the run.
The amount of people who resorted to using their mobiles during the performance last night was also sad and worrying.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 30, 2016 9:22:08 GMT
Yes, what was with that queue last night to get in? Did they open the doors late? I arrived at 6.55 thinking I'd swan in and got stuck in a big queue.
No point ringing the 5 minute bell angrily at us, Old Vic, if we can't actually get into the damn theatre!!
|
|
2,047 posts
|
Post by Marwood on Sept 30, 2016 9:33:22 GMT
Cheers for the heads up regarding queueing, I'm going tonight so better get there early.
|
|
546 posts
|
Post by drmaplewood on Sept 30, 2016 10:13:46 GMT
They've been offering £5 stalls seats for next week - can't be selling well. Really, where?
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 30, 2016 11:45:12 GMT
Cheers for the heads up regarding queueing, I'm going tonight so better get there early. Hopefully it will be better tonight. I'm wondering if the Head Door Opener at the Old Vic forgot it was a 7pm start rather than the usual 7.30pm for this show ;-)
|
|
433 posts
|
Post by DuchessConstance on Sept 30, 2016 16:01:27 GMT
They've been offering £5 stalls seats for next week - can't be selling well. Really, where? Sending out emails, but I noticed a tweet with a deal code too.
|
|
2,047 posts
|
Post by Marwood on Oct 1, 2016 11:26:56 GMT
The theatre was pretty full last night (but I'm guessing probably because of the £10 tickets), no queue to get in but it was 10 minutes or so late starting (and it ran for about 75-80 minutes, so the info on the website was a bit misleading). No walkouts until the second scene change,when there seemed to be a mass stampede in the seats behind me, and again on the third scene change. A lot of people around me kept fidgeting with shopping bags during the show, there were also a lot of mobile phones going off - if a show only lasts an hour (or is supposed to), I can't see why people can't keep their phones switched off. It was Beckett, not Mamma Mia or Jersey Boys, maybe people should do a little bit of research into what they're going to see and whether they might get bored before buying tickets, regardless of the cost.
I thought the actual show was OK, some nice uses of sound,lighting and back projection - I also wouldn't like to say for sure what it was about (this was the third or fourth Beckett production I've seen, and none of them are the sort of thing you could easily explain to someone who hadn't been there what they were about). I also thought Lisa Dwan was great in this, I didn't see the previous Becket show she did a few years back, but I'd like to see her perform in something written by a different writer.
|
|
1,502 posts
|
Post by foxa on Oct 1, 2016 13:14:14 GMT
I don't know if I'm going to go see this, but I am loving reading these reviews. The disconnect between the audience sneaking out/phones going off and Beckett is kind of appealing.
|
|
1,502 posts
|
Post by foxa on Oct 1, 2016 13:15:14 GMT
Of course, if it was Sartre there would be 'No Exit.'
Thank you, here all week.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 1, 2016 19:51:07 GMT
I thought the actual show was OK, some nice uses of sound,lighting and back projection - I also wouldn't like to say for sure what it was about (this was the third or fourth Beckett production I've seen, and none of them are the sort of thing you could easily explain to someone who hadn't been there what they were about). The closest I could get to finding any meaning was: (Not trying to be as arcane as Beckett here, honest. Just had 2 failed attempts at generating spoiler text on my iPad! Will try again...)
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 1, 2016 20:01:45 GMT
Trying again... {Spoiler - click to view} That the character was a soul waiting to be (re)born. Though it could just as easily be musing on identity (particularly female identity).
|
|
2,047 posts
|
Post by Marwood on Oct 1, 2016 22:15:20 GMT
I don't know if the various scenes were particularly linked but I haven't read the text on which this was based. I'm too ignorant to know how to do the whole hidden spoilerising thing on here but I thought it touched on themes of death (and the possibility of life/existence after it), identity/personality, internal thought, debate and ego and also gender but feel free to correct me if I am wrong (which I'm guessing I almost certainly am)
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 1, 2016 22:53:10 GMT
Yes, I'd agree with all that. I think I read afterwards that it's based on 4 prose pieces, so it's perfectly possible it could/should be 4 different characters.
The fact that the actress's costume remained the same throughout suggests to me we were meant to see them all as connected somehow, but that's just my interpretation!
The bloodied landscape in the second segment made me think of birth, but I'm sure I read an interview where Dwan said the piece is meant to encourage people just to 'examine their own wounds'.
To be honest, the whole thing is so weird, I could probably make a convincing argument for it being about a penguin trying to purchase life insurance on the moon, and I doubt anyone could disprove it. ;-)
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 3, 2016 12:11:18 GMT
|
|