|
|
Post by Deleted on May 9, 2016 20:31:37 GMT
I don't agree. She's damned BECAUSE she does. Millions of actresses get through life perfectly nicely without embarassing themselves on Twitter, swearing, getting rat-arsed and acting like complete chavs at awards ceremonies. So what makes you or anyone else the judge of how someone should behave? Would we castigate a for being royal or a working class lass for being a working class lass? it's the idea that the public should be able to treat anyone as public 'property', to be told how they should be that I deeply dislike. Maybe it's partly as I'm from a similar background but it seems very off to me, not all of us share the same code of behaviour, and nor should we. |
|
19,856 posts
|
Post by BurlyBeaR on May 9, 2016 21:05:23 GMT
I don't agree. She's damned BECAUSE she does. Millions of actresses get through life perfectly nicely without embarassing themselves on Twitter, swearing, getting rat-arsed and acting like complete chavs at awards ceremonies. So what makes you or anyone else the judge of how someone should behave? Would we castigate a for being royal or a working class lass for being a working class lass? it's the idea that the public should be able to treat anyone as public 'property', to be told how they should be that I deeply dislike. Maybe it's partly as I'm from a similar background but it seems very off to me, not all of us share the same code of behaviour, and nor should we. If Sheridan keeps sticking it under my nose, I'm going to judge it. If Sheridan doesn't want to be judged on her behaviour, behave better! She has made herself public property. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on May 9, 2016 21:08:25 GMT
So what makes you or anyone else the judge of how someone should behave? Would we castigate a for being royal or a working class lass for being a working class lass? it's the idea that the public should be able to treat anyone as public 'property', to be told how they should be that I deeply dislike. Maybe it's partly as I'm from a similar background but it seems very off to me, not all of us share the same code of behaviour, and nor should we. If Sheridan keeps sticking it under my nose, I'm going to judge it. If Sheridan doesn't want to be judged on her behaviour, behave better! She has made herself public property. It's quite hard to behave better when all the press literally slate her for one little thing she does wrong. They need to move on from her, it's not good for her. Probably lowering her self esteem and making her feel horrible. It's not very nice to hear all this stuff being said about you in the papers which people then believe. She's an a,asking actress and person and is going through a very hard time |
|
20 posts
|
Post by paul on May 9, 2016 21:40:43 GMT
Seems like Sheridan is losing the plot again. No tweets for a whilst & not she's accusing the press of bullying her. She tweets - people complain. She doesn't tweet - people say "she's losing the plot". The press are fairly obviously targeting her at the moment (knowing her family are going through a hard time). Fair accusation on her part IMHO. As for Graham Norton taking such a cheap shot at a soft target at the BAFTAs... Well let's hope he never needs support from industry peers. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on May 9, 2016 21:40:46 GMT
So what makes you or anyone else the judge of how someone should behave? Would we castigate a for being royal or a working class lass for being a working class lass? it's the idea that the public should be able to treat anyone as public 'property', to be told how they should be that I deeply dislike. Maybe it's partly as I'm from a similar background but it seems very off to me, not all of us share the same code of behaviour, and nor should we. If Sheridan keeps sticking it under my nose, I'm going to judge it. If Sheridan doesn't want to be judged on her behaviour, behave better! She has made herself public property. Nobody is anyone else's property. What is this, the middle ages? The entitlement attitude of 'I pay my ticket fee/TV licence' so I have a right to express my opinion is getting out of hand. Everyone is paid for by everyone else, pretty much, but I don't go around expecting whoever killed the chicken i just ate, drove the train I took or stitched together my shirt to abide by my way of life. The same should hold for anyone in the public eye, they are not ours in any way, shape or form. If they don't break any laws then I don't care, actually even if they do break some. It is certainly in living memory that to be outed in the press as gay could destroy a career and lead to prosecution, let us not forget that. The press have just moved onto other pastures. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on May 10, 2016 5:23:36 GMT
I was starting to think I was the only person who couldn't care less about the personal habits of complete strangers I've never met and probably never will.
I really don't get this celebrity thing at all. If I followed a stranger home and sifted through their rubbish to find out their secrets, took surreptitious photographs of them while they're out with friends or spied on them while they're on holiday then my interest in them would be viewed with a certain amount of justifiable suspicion. But if a journalist does the dirty work on my behalf and publishes the results then the same level of interest in a stranger is suddenly OK. Weird.
|
|
19,856 posts
|
Post by BurlyBeaR on May 10, 2016 6:41:10 GMT
If Sheridan keeps sticking it under my nose, I'm going to judge it. If Sheridan doesn't want to be judged on her behaviour, behave better! She has made herself public property. Nobody is anyone else's property. What is this, the middle ages? The entitlement attitude of 'I pay my ticket fee/TV licence' so I have a right to express my opinion is getting out of hand. Everyone is paid for by everyone else, pretty much, but I don't go around expecting whoever killed the chicken i just ate, drove the train I took or stitched together my shirt to abide by my way of life. The same should hold for anyone in the public eye, they are not ours in any way, shape or form. If they don't break any laws then I don't care, actually even if they do break some. It is certainly in living memory that to be outed in the press as gay could destroy a career and lead to prosecution, let us not forget that. The press have just moved onto other pastures. Yeh but the person who killed your chicken isn't shouting "YEAH I KILLED YOUR CHICKEN YOU PUSSY!" all over Twitter or making a fool of themselves on tv, are they. That's the difference and that's what I mean by public property. Nothing to do with buying tickets. |
|
20 posts
|
Post by paul on May 10, 2016 6:55:32 GMT
I was starting to think I was the only person who couldn't care less about the personal habits of complete strangers I've never met and probably never will. I really don't get this celebrity thing at all. If I followed a stranger home and sifted through their rubbish to find out their secrets, took surreptitious photographs of them while they're out with friends or spied on them while they're on holiday then my interest in them would be viewed with a certain amount of justifiable suspicion. But if a journalist does the dirty work on my behalf and publishes the results then the same level of interest in a stranger is suddenly OK. Weird. Well said! |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on May 10, 2016 8:31:28 GMT
I just think that it's one thing for Sheridan Smith to be having emotional streaks and behaving in a seemingly unprofessional manner on the internet where everyone can see it (apart from people who weren't following her Twitter account when she locked it and are thus locked out), but it's another thing to be sneery about it. It's the sneeriness that makes me uncomfortable. Discussion, fair enough. Concern, sure, we're all human. Sneeriness? Nah, that's just a little too far for me.
|
|
2,348 posts
|
Post by theglenbucklaird on May 10, 2016 22:16:36 GMT
Always thought Anthony made the right decision choosing Saskia over Emma
|
|
