19,670 posts
|
Post by BurlyBeaR on Apr 26, 2019 7:10:10 GMT
Anyone seen this? It’s getting decent feedback from the small number of reviews I’ve seen.
|
|
837 posts
|
Post by duncan on May 31, 2019 10:30:44 GMT
Working in Glasgow this afternoon so staying on to see this.
I've been hot and cold on the previous James adaptations. The one with Shane Ritchie was jaw droppingly awful and the Tina Hobley (buried man from Holyoaks) one was hideously bad but very entertaining whilst the killer twin one was actually rather enjoyable for the right reasons.
|
|
837 posts
|
Post by duncan on May 31, 2019 21:40:43 GMT
I need to sleep on it but James appears to be living in 2009, our lead is a web designer and yet a significant plot point is how amazing and out of this world he finds an Alexa he gets for his 40th birthday.
My Dad is in his 70s and he can bloody work an Alexa.
|
|
|
Post by xanady on May 31, 2019 21:48:08 GMT
Seen a lot of these clunky one-set thrillers over the years,all wanting to be the new Mousetrap.At one point and forgive me if they still exist,there was actually an Agatha ChristieTheatre Company,if my creaking memory serves.Usually include a fairly-famous matinee-idol type and some sterling old-school supporting actors with a sprinkling of newcomers.They are a touring staple and good luck to them all,I say.
|
|
837 posts
|
Post by duncan on May 31, 2019 21:58:54 GMT
The Agatha Christie TC lost the licence a couple of years back but are still on the go with a new name as the Classic Thriller Theatre Company - currently out on the road with their version of The Lady Vanishes.
|
|
|
Post by xanady on Jun 1, 2019 11:26:19 GMT
^Thanks,duncan...oooh,I might try and catch that show somewhere as I love the old black and white Hitchcock movie.
|
|
837 posts
|
Post by duncan on Jun 1, 2019 12:14:38 GMT
The House on Cold Hill - Theatre Royal O'Hare is killed on the day he moves into Cold Hill House, over 30 years later Ollie and family become the next residents of a location that no one has wanted to move into.
Strange happenings start to make the family wonder if there really is something in the story of the grey lady who supposedly haunts the house - especially when Ollie discovers that all of the previous male residents have died on their 40th birthday and *GULP* for Ollie that’s this coming Monday!!!!Cripes on a stick, this is a rotten script - a script so devoid of scares, chills and twists that it defies belief that anyone will find this in any way frightening or indeed shocking, If you cant see the final moments coming from the time that they are mentioned much earlier on in the show then go home and watch some Poirot to get yourself up to speed on spotting significant clues. As mentioned above Ollie is a web designer in his 30s but when given an Alexa as an early birthday present he's in awe of it and seemingly cant believe what it can do - which is a point hammered home by repeated mentions in the first 15 minutes or so that he's rubbish with technology BUT he's bought the haunted house through the proceeds of the sale of his advertising company. We're told to think he's a luddite but he's got a laptop, phone etc. Its character motivation to move the plot towards where it has to be for things to go bump in the night rather than actual development of a real character. Bit of a spoiler - Alexa of course gets taken over at various points by the ghoulies to spout messages of doom and so on AND YET it takes the husband and wife ages to switch the bloody thing off! Its not until the daughter points out that it could be a local with a grudge who has hacked their wi-fi (something which Ollie understands!!!) for them to decide to not have it on. Ah yes, the daughter - now I spent the first half hour or so thinking that as Ollie is about to turn 40 its odd that he has a daughter in her 20s but no, she is only 16 (bumped from 12 in the book apparently) but its clearly someone older playing down but she isn't doing a very good job, admittedly the script has seemingly been written by someone who has never talked to a 16 year old girl in the last 30 years and she's struggling to be a real human but it just doesn't work. One of many quite unfathomable pieces of casting in this. Not one single person on stage comes out of this with any credit - well maybe the actor playing O'Hare as he gets bumped off after 2 minutes into this. Joe McFadden is giving us rising stages of hysteria as Ollie, Rita Simons is too laid back as his wife, Charlie Clements cant decide if he's playing Egon from Ghostbusters or Joe Grundy and Tricia Deighton is channelling 250% of Angela Lansbury in Blithe Spirit as the local ghost whisperer cum house cleaner. The script is clunky, the direction is clunky, the acting is clunky and its just not scary. The lighting seemed to be running around 15 seconds ahead of the action as well - I think this was by choice but it becomes clear early on that something is going to happen as characters will be in the middle of conversations as the lighting changes for us then to be shocked by the ghost of O'Hare appearing at the window in spectral form or some such. Its tell rather than show and for me it diminishes any shocks there may be. PLOT REVEAL ahoy!!! Even the ending is nonsense, they have decided they need to find the buried body of the grey lady and give her a proper burial so she can be at rest after centuries of haunting and as it turns out she has been bricked up in a priest hole off the bathroom - AND YET NOBODY HAS PREVIOUSLY NOTICED UNTIL THIS POINT THAT THE ROOM WHERE ALL OF THE ACTION TAKES PLACE HAS AN EXTRA WINDOW, as indeed yes the dead body is hidden behind said extra window. I think the sudden lighting of the skeleton is supposed to shock us all but last night you could see the skeleton being moved into place so that kind of ever so slightly took the edge of it. But despite all that, I actually had a good time. Its only a 100 minutes long so zips along (plus interval) and the script even gets in a gag about Strictly. Would I recommend it, No. Would I ever see it again, No. But did I actually think it was fun to watch, yes. Sometimes its nice to see something that is just so misconceived that you cant help but be swept up in the ineptness of it all. 6/10 - entertainingly awful.
|
|
1,936 posts
|
Post by wickedgrin on Jun 5, 2019 9:52:30 GMT
I caught this earlier in the tour and thought it was dreadful. It reminded me of am dram at the village hall from the script to the set to the acting. I didn't comment at the time as my new year resolution was that if you had nothing good to say it was best to say nothing at all!
Work must be difficult to come by in the acting profession as even those "off the telly" have to tour in this for weeks on end. But the rent has to be paid!
But on a positive note the theatre was packed when I saw it, not always the case these days!
|
|