|
|
Post by asfound on Aug 7, 2018 16:17:14 GMT
I think this was probably the best thing I've seen at the NT in my admittedly short time as a regular theatregoer. It was just exceptional, I wouldn't have changed a thing. 3 and a half hours just flew by; at the same time it was as epic, powerful and as full of ideas as a John Steinbeck novel. Not even Miss jangly bangles sitting behind me could pull me out of the story. A great palate cleanser after the cloying tedium of Home, I'm Darling that has restored my faith.
|
|
391 posts
|
Post by lichtie on Aug 9, 2018 19:04:49 GMT
Thought this was very good. Wasn't sure I'd take to the style, but I felt they managed it really well, and the cast are all excellent. Last act is weaker, but thought that was more because it largely involved characters who were far more sketches than the fleshed out ones at the start. Didn't feel the length at all. And I don't really agree about the absence of slavery as a topic at the start since its pretty clear from what was presented that they strongly supported the plantation owners, and it was also obvious that this meant supporting slavery as well. Just as well this was good, or else my two months without any theatre would have been broken by a poor run over these last two days....
|
|
587 posts
|
Post by Polly1 on Aug 22, 2018 23:29:28 GMT
Despite having the world's tallest man in front of my dynamically-priced-upwards seat, I thought this was an absolutely brilliant evening. Not a conventional play but so theatrical and engrossing with a tour de force by SRB. I wonder if this might go to New York, I should think they would lap it up.
|
|
|
|
Post by songbird on Aug 23, 2018 1:00:06 GMT
Saw this tonight - front row. My initial fears of the goliath Lyttleton stage overpowering 3 performers was gone as soon as the curtain rose. The direction and acting is so superb that it feels as intimate as the Dorfman at times (although this is probably felt less further back in the auditorium). I really enjoyed it and did not feel as if it dragged at all. Fantastic acting, gorgeous set and projections. It felt like a privilege to watch the actors perform. Bargain at £7.50 with EntryPass.
Question - how do the National sort out the ensemble of bankers right at the end of the play? Logistically I'm not sure how it works. Do they have a group of 15 actors just hanging around the National all day? Are they paid for just their 1 minute of performing time?
Similar thing with the credited Janitor right at the start of the play. On stage for 30 seconds when the curtain rises, and then on stage for 1 minute nearly 4 hours later as part of the banking group. Does this guy just have the best job in the world? I saw he is credited as being an understudy too - is he on standby during the show?
|
|
|
|
Post by partytentdown on Aug 23, 2018 7:43:33 GMT
Saw this tonight - front row. My initial fears of the goliath Lyttleton stage overpowering 3 performers was gone as soon as the curtain rose. The direction and acting is so superb that it feels as intimate as the Dorfman at times (although this is probably felt less further back in the auditorium). I really enjoyed it and did not feel as if it dragged at all. Fantastic acting, gorgeous set and projections. It felt like a privilege to watch the actors perform. Bargain at £7.50 with EntryPass. Question - how do the National sort out the ensemble of bankers right at the end of the play? Logistically I'm not sure how it works. Do they have a group of 15 actors just hanging around the National all day? Are they paid for just their 1 minute of performing time? Similar thing with the credited Janitor right at the start of the play. On stage for 30 seconds when the curtain rises, and then on stage for 1 minute nearly 4 hours later as part of the banking group. Does this guy just have the best job in the world? I saw he is credited as being an understudy too - is he on standby during the show? I believe the janitor is a walking cover for the other three actors so is on standby in case one of them gets ill or injured. Not sure who would then play the janitor! The bankers are glamorously called 'supernumeraries' i.e. extras. They probably don't need to arrive until half an hour before the scene and are likely part of a larger rotating group. I'm not even sure if they are paid... I assume nowadays they are but for a long time supernumeraries at places like the National and Globe were volunteer actors looking for a bit of experience. |
|
5,688 posts
|
Post by lynette on Aug 23, 2018 11:25:49 GMT
So the janitor has to learn all three parts? Wow! Earns his wages, then.
|
|
397 posts
|
Post by altamont on Aug 23, 2018 11:48:42 GMT
As I recall the programme listed three understudies, Leighton Pugh was SRB's, and the actor playing the janitor was one of the other two
|
|
105 posts
|
Post by youngoffender on Sept 2, 2018 10:23:17 GMT
I found this deeply underwhelming, a dramatically inert 'one ****ing thing after another' history of a banking family that had zero emotional resonance and taught me nothing worthwhile. I don't know whether the trope of repetition to distil successive incidents or to hammer home character quirks was in the original or inserted by Ben Power, but I found it almost as irritating as the inexplicable amusement it continued to cause the over-laughers in the audience, even at its 25th outing. The performances were admirable, but more as feats of memory than of acting, with SRB's performance in particular seeming to be just a series of 'turns'. Godley fluffed a line mistaking his son for his brother, but easily done - I didn't care which generation of the Lehmans I was watching either.
|
|
|
|
Post by songbird on Sept 2, 2018 11:12:15 GMT
Godley fluffed a line mistaking his son for his brother, but easily done - I didn't care which generation of the Lehmans I was watching either. He fluffed a line when I saw it too. He said "October" and then corrected himself to "December". Not sure what the point was in correcting himself. |
|
382 posts
|
Post by stevemar on Sept 2, 2018 18:00:56 GMT
I enjoyed this a lot and even joined the standing ovation - for the acting mind. However, it was far too long, and repetitive. Also, I am not a big fan of the “tell rather than show” approach to the play which distances you from the story. Maybe that was one reason I didn’t “get” The Inheritance as much of others, but that’s another story.
It still worked well in the moment given the excellent acting, a surprisingly simple but effective set, so a deserved hit for the National.
|
|
49 posts
|
Post by kjb on Sept 7, 2018 17:50:29 GMT
I've got a ticket for this that I can no longer use.
Matinee
Tuesday 25 Sept at 1pm.
Front row seat
£16.00 (£15.00 + £1 postage)
Going for face value
Anyone want it?
(Regular board reader, but don't post very much)
|
|
g3
Auditioning
|
Post by g3 on Sept 8, 2018 12:01:19 GMT
Yep, I'll have it please...
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 12, 2018 9:13:04 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 12, 2018 9:34:45 GMT
Hope it does better than "Enron" did!
|
|
49 posts
|
Post by kjb on Sept 12, 2018 14:09:12 GMT
Yep, I'll have it please... Do you still want it? I've not seen any reply to my messages. If not it's still available to anyone, or I'll post it back to the National on Friday to get a credit. |
|
|
|
Post by westendwahwah on Sept 12, 2018 14:40:16 GMT
The Lehman Trilogy will transfer to New York, to the Park Avenue Armory, for a limited season in March 2019
Park Avenue Armory, in collaboration with the National Theatre and Neal Street Productions, will present the North American premiere of The Lehman Trilogy, by Stefano Massini, adapted by Ben Power, directed by Sam Mendes at the Wade Thompson Dill Hall, Park Avenue Armory, following a sold-out run at the National Theatre from 22 March – 20 April 2019. Adam Godley, Ben Miles, and Simon Russell Beale will reprise their critically-acclaimed roles.
|
|
91 posts
|
Post by gazzaw13 on Sept 12, 2018 17:22:45 GMT
Just back from seeing this. A deserved standing ovation for a stunning production with first class acting. I've been a sucker for a narrated piece ever since Shawshank Redemption and I thoroughly enjoyed this. I had some trepidation in advance of seeing a 3.5 hour play about Lehmans with only 3 actors but thye really nailed it. 5*
|
|
1,046 posts
|
Post by jgblunners on Sept 26, 2018 10:42:04 GMT
Saw this last night and loved it. One of the best pieces of storytelling I've ever seen on stage - bravo to the whole creative team for taking a subject matter that I honestly have almost no interest in and turning it into such an engaging piece of theatre. The three actors are simply sublime, full of charisma and each of them has the audience in the palm of his hand. Brilliant design - I always love the 'less is more' approach - and the pianist was a lovely touch too. Plus they had a revolve so that's instant bonus points in my book. God I love the NT.
|
|
1,345 posts
|
Post by tmesis on Sept 26, 2018 12:00:50 GMT
Saw this last night and loved it. One of the best pieces of storytelling I've ever seen on stage - bravo to the whole creative team for taking a subject matter that I honestly have almost no interest in and turning it into such an engaging piece of theatre. The three actors are simply sublime, full of charisma and each of them has the audience in the palm of his hand. Brilliant design - I always love the 'less is more' approach - and the pianist was a lovely touch too. Plus they had a revolve so that's instant bonus points in my book. God I love the NT. I had the exact opposite experience to you. I was interested in the Lehman's story but this bored the pants off me. |
|
3,557 posts
|
Post by showgirl on Sept 27, 2018 18:42:49 GMT
Probably going to be returning a pair of £15 tix for this (matinee Wed 17 October), too, as I didn't want to see it in the first place and only booked when OH belatedly expressed an interest but now he may not be well enough.
When I was at the NT recently during a performance I was interested to note that they appeared to be showing the entire play on a tv monitor in the foyer. I've never noticed this before so wonder if it's a new development? I know some theatres do this for latecomers until they are able to creep in at a suitable moment, but for the whole performance? One enterprising lady had pulled up a chair and seemed set to stay for the duration but that can hardly be what the NT intended as there is no seating in that area and people congregating there would cause an obstruction.
|
|
3,557 posts
|
Post by showgirl on Sept 28, 2018 12:50:06 GMT
I noticed the monitors too, and thought they were just for latecomers. I mean, if you can just buy a script, pull up a chair... Wonder if they thought that one through? Indeed, and no script needed as there was sound too. |
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 28, 2018 12:54:32 GMT
They've been there ages I think? I don't think they are left on for the whole performance, usually off after the interval. Or maybe after the first latecomers' point after the interval. Presumably on for longer during Lehman Trilogy due to the two intervals?
|
|
2,476 posts
|
Post by zahidf on Oct 15, 2018 7:53:13 GMT
West end transfer
|
|
2,740 posts
|
Post by n1david on Oct 15, 2018 8:20:58 GMT
Fantastic news, I loved this, although I know it didn’t find universal praise here. Can’t help feeling that it might struggle for a West End audience, although I’ll happily see it again. Just wondering whether the short NY run is designed as an advert to next summer’s American tourists...
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 15, 2018 8:26:28 GMT
I'm sure it'll be fine, it sold very quickly at the National, and it's the kind of prestige piece that'll draw in the kind of person who very carefully chooses their three theatre trips a year according to which has the most impressive names and the most respectable content. There'll probably also be some regular theatre-goers glad to have the chance to revisit it, or even see it for the first time if they couldn't get to the NT run for whatever reason.
|
|
